Skip to main content

Table 3 Illustrative examples of FIS and SCDS BNT results corrected for unaccounted confounding

From: Estimating uncertainty in observational studies of associations between continuous variables: example of methylmercury and neuropsychological testing in children

Scenario

Confounder SD

Confounder Correlation with

Regression slope

  

Exposure

Outcome

Observed

Corrected

FIS

     

Scenario 1

15.0

-0.10

0.20

-0.019

-0.015

Scenario 2

15.0

0.10

0.20

-0.019

-0.023

Scenario 4

15.0

-0.50

0.20

-0.019

0.002

Scenario 3

15.0

0.50

0.20

-0.019

-0.053

Scenario 5

15.0

-0.10

0.80

-0.019

-0.002

Scenario 6

15.0

0.10

0.80

-0.019

-0.036

Scenario 7

15.0

-0.50

0.80

-0.019

0.085

Scenario 8

15.0

0.50

0.80

-0.019

-0.136

SCDS

     

Scenario 1

15.0

-0.10

0.20

-0.012

0.01

Scenario 2

15.0

0.10

0.20

-0.012

-0.03

Scenario 3

15.0

-0.50

0.20

-0.012

0.13

Scenario 4

15.0

0.50

0.20

-0.012

-0.16

Scenario 5

15.0

-0.10

0.80

-0.012

0.07

Scenario 6

15.0

0.10

0.80

-0.012

-0.10

Scenario 7

15.0

-0.50

0.80

-0.012

0.55

Scenario 8

15.0

0.50

0.80

-0.012

-0.58

  1. SD: standard deviation